It’s the final day of… Wagatha Christie

19 May 2022

Today is the last day of the Wagatha Christie trial between Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney with their lawyers giving their closing arguments in the High Court. This all started when Coleen Rooney accused Rebekah Vardy of leaking her private Instagram stories, and other stories about Coleen and her family, to The Sun newspaper.

In October 2019, Coleen Rooney tweeted about the ‘burden in her life for years’, where Coleen revealed “it’s……… Rebekah Vardy’s account”.  In the tweet to the millions of her followers, Coleen accused Vardy  of selling Rooney’s stories to the press.   In response, Vardy launched a civil lawsuit, against Coleen for defamation to clear her name arguing that she was falsely accused, which she still maintains. Her argument is that the person leaking stories about Coleen was somebody else, and this is the crux of the past two weeks of legal arguments and impassioned evidence.

What is defamation? Defamation is where someone’s reputation is damaged by the words of another person. Libellous defamation is a type of defamation which is conducted through a permanent form of communication, like posting through social media, which is what we have with the Wagatha Christie case. In order to prove defamation, a statement must be made that refers to the Claimant, in this case Rebekah Vardy, and that statement must cause (or must be likely to cause) serious harm to the reputation of the Claimant once published.

The argument is that Rooney defamed Vardy with her tweet and accusations of leaking her private stories to The Sun, and that as a result of this Mrs Vardy suffered reputational and financial damage. This will be for the High Court to decide, and the judgement is to be delivered at a later date.

There are multiple defences to defamation, one of which is the truth defence: if the statement made is true, then this will be  an absolute defence to defamation.  This  is Rooney’s defence. Vardy’s lawyer states that if the information was leaked ‘it was not something that was done with Mrs Vardy’s knowledge or authority’. Without full knowledge of the case and the evidence, we cannot predict the court’s decision, but we have been following the case online and been surprised by the scandalous revelations that have come out throughout the witness evidence.

Whatever your views on the high profile trial, there is no doubt that the trial has been stressful and uncomfortable for all the participants.  Similarly, handling a situation in which  your business has been defamed can lead to significant distress and damage to a business’s reputation. We have handled a number of these situations for  our clients, including one where our client’s  competitor was spreading untrue rumours about our client’s business practices, with a view to winning our client’s customers for themselves.

If you feel that you or your business has been defamed,  and would like some advice, please feel free to get in touch with Sally Mouhim by telephone 01273 447 065, email [email protected] or click here to fill out an enquiry form.

Get in touch

Related Stories


Renter Reform: No more no-fault evictions

Do you rent privately through a landlord or are you a private landlord? If so, you will be interested in the game-changing ‘Renters Reform Bill’ which is set to drastically change the landscape of private renting. The reform imposes more obligations on landlords but also brings clarity and support to landlords with the provision of a private-renters’ ombudsman to settle disputes.


All about Franchising- A Quick Guide

Franchising is a business format whereby a licence is granted enabling the licensee to trade their own business under the brand of the franchisor. It can be beneficial for both parties involved and can really help with the expansion of a company…


Is being called ‘bald’ sex harassment? Yes, according the employment tribunal.

Under the Equality Act, employees are protected from discrimination relating to (among other protected characteristics) age and sex. In a recent case, Tony Finn claimed that he had been a victim of sex harassment in the work place after his supervisor called him a ‘bald c**t’. The Claimant also claimed age discrimination as he originally said he was called an ‘old bald c**t’ but the tribunal did not accept this had been said. The claimant was more upset about the comments about his appearance than the use of the strong ‘Anglo-Saxon’ language.

Check us out on social